May be the Puff Bar Targeted at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?
Puff Bar is an excellent alternative to a normal ice cream treat because it has none of the cons associated with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is a simple sweet treat, that makes it a great alternative to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to create, you can make it as often as you want without having to prepare the ice cream every time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.
Puff Bar is a relatively new product, which was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we have been exposing ourselves to a large number of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and in addition has zero calories. The manufacturers claim that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes since it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the biggest issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. Because of this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they’re currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar declare that people who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so when they only need to take with you the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar know that since public health officials have been calling to find out more on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to know more about Puff Bar and whether or not it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Based on the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert which allows you to put it into the mouth area, therefore you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you may go. If the product also has an extinguisher it is also in violation of the law. The reason being that since there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it is not a valid device to use to refill a preexisting e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke a different one.
Because the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the companies that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a manner that is illegal. In addition to sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request they no longer refer to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in regulations. This is because there is currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wished to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco into podsmall.com the marketplace.
As well as the possibility of case being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes available could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are offered non-tobacco flavored e-cigs are more likely to replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to teenagers and to the younger generations, this could substantially reduce the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to several tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes could lead smokers to search out “real” cigarettes and not rely so heavily on an alternative solution that may not provide them with nicotine.
It seems that the UK government could have a point. There is currently no requirement of tobacco companies to include warning labels on their products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have in common is that they will not cause cancer or other diseases. It looks a question of economics that’s being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem like a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they’re essentially creating products which are more difficult to consume, which in turn implies that fewer people will purchase them.